Discharge planning under fire
Case Management Weekly, October 9, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Critics of post-discharge planning have taken the stand in front of a California legislative panel, reports The Sacramento Bee. The state's Aging & Long-Term Care and Health committees met to discuss the discharge plans given to patients before they left hospital.
Among those testifying was Barbara Biglieri of the California Association for Health Service at Home; she claimed that 25% of patients currently return to hospital within one week of discharge and that more than half return within three weeks.
Other experts blamed LOS and cost pressures for what they saw as inadequate planning and a lack of access to at-home services, with one critic adding that "virtually any frail senior will be viewed by doctors and discharge planners as nursing care eligible."
But as the panel heard that regulations often impose barriers for patients wanting to return to their homes, state officials confirmed that a strategy for improving care for seniors and a coordinated care pilot were in development.
Source: The Sacramento Bee
Other articles of interest
Good discharge planning can improve share
Discharge Planning Guide: Tools for Compliance
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched
