Federal ruling changes immigrant reimbursement
Case Management Weekly, October 2, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
The federal government has told New York state officials that emergency chemotherapy for illegal immigrants is no longer eligible for reimbursement. The ruling, revealed in The New York Times, prompted a wave of protest from health officials, who claimed that hospitals would be landed with the financial burden.
Under Medicaid, illegal immigrants can access emergency treatment. Although such immigrants cannot benefit from continuing care, only organ transplants have, until now, been specifically excluded from reimbursement, leaving states free to decide what constituted emergency care. New York state health officials have contended the latest ruling, asking that doctors retain the right to determine the boundaries of emergency treatment.
The federal government, which reached its decision following a three and a half-year audit of New York hospitals, said in a statement that "longstanding interpretations by the agency have been that emergency Medicaid benefits are to cover emergencies."
Source: The New York Times
Other articles of interest: Case management in the ED
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched
