For cancer patients, benefit caps can mean big bills
Case Management Weekly, September 25, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Employers and health plans are putting increased caps on the maximum benefits they will pay for cost-intensive cancer treatments, as well as other restrictions on coverage that greatly affect cancer patients.
The policy limits on coverage do not apply only to cancer, but cancer patients are most likely to hit annual limits on doctor visits or drugs because cancer treatment is often intensive in the months following diagnosis.
"Every year the caps are getting lower, and they're more diverse," says Nancy Davenport-Ennis, CEO and founder of Patient Advocate Foundation, according to U.S. News and World Report. "Now insurers are capping their exposure on a range of goods and services."
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, about half of employer-sponsored health plans have lifetime benefit limits of $1 million or $2 million on health coverage. But in some cases, patient advocates report now seeing lifetime limits of just $50,000 or $100,000.
Source: Patient Access Weekly Advisor, HCPro, Inc.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched
