End of late fees: CMS waives Part D penalty
Case Management Weekly, January 17, 2007
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
End of late fees: CMS waives Part D penalty
CMS has extended the Part D special enrollment period for low income beneficiaries through 2007 by waiving the late enrollment penalty (LEP) for eligible individuals, the agency announced last week.
Generally, Medicare beneficiaries who are qualified to join a prescription drug plan, or Part D, but choose not to enroll during their initial enrollment period, may be subject to a LEP. These fees were intended to encourage Medicare beneficiaries to sign up for the drug coverage plan when they first become eligible, but may cause some low-income beneficiaries to avoid seeking coverage.
"It is very important that we remove whatever barriers may be preventing low-income beneficiaries from taking advantage of this great, cost-saving program," CMS acting Administrator Leslie V. Norwalk said in a press release. "This is our most difficult population to reach and the one for which we continue to focus on our efforts. By continuing to remove the fear of a later fee for those who may not be able to pay, we are taking a positive step aimed at broader coverage for everyone."
Source:Bureau of National Affairs; CMS
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched
