Hospital-at-home study finds, 'there's no place like home' for certain elderly patients
Case Management Weekly, March 8, 2006
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
In the future, more elderly patients requiring hospital level of care could find themselves staying at home-yet still receiving the best quality care. A study conducted by Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore has revealed that a program to provide acute hospital care in their own homes to elderly patients suffering from one of four common conditions is a safe and viable alternative to admitting the patients to a hospital.
The study compared hospital-at-home care with care provided in an acute-care facility for patients 65 and older who required care for either pneumonia, chronic heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or cellulitis.
The patients could choose whether they wanted to be admitted or treated at home. Treatment at home included continuous nursing care and at least daily visits from a nurse and a physician. The patients received high-levels of medical treatment, including oxygen therapy and intravenous medication.
Two-thirds of the patients chose the hospital-at-home option and the study found that these patients did better than their hospital admitted counterparts. LOS was reduced from 4.9 days for admitted patients to 3.2 days for home patients. The home patients suffered fewer complications, and the overall cost of care was reduced to an average of $5,081, compared to an average of $7,480 for the admitted patients.
The study concluded that the hospital-at-home model was highly successful for many elderly patients for whom hospital care may not be the ideal or preferred environment.
Source:NurseZone.com
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched
