Hospitals may struggle to comply with DRG increase
Case Management Weekly, August 24, 2005
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Hospitals can expect to work harder than before to comply with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) post-acute care transfer payment policy. According to the final 2006 Medicare inpatient prospective payment system (IPPS) regulation-which goes into effect on Oct. 1-hospitals must check compliance with 182 diagnosis-related groups (DRG), a jump from the current 29 DRGs. (DRGs dictate the payment rates a hospital can receive for services provided.) Under the policy, hospitals receive partial payment of certain DRGs for discharging patients to post-acute care facilities, (e.g., skilled nursing facilities). The new regulation's enactment comes after widespread noncompliance of the current policy was discovered by Medicare auditors. CMS is trying to keep Medicare from paying hospitals twice for the same care. For example, Medicare may pay the hospital's DRG for care given, and then the post-acute facility may receive payment as well. CMS predicts Medicare will save $780 million dollars by adding 153 DRGs for hospitals to comply with.
For more information about the DRG changes, click here.
Source: Report on Medicare Compliance
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched
