Sneak peek: Is improper billing inflating your readmission rate?
Case Management Weekly, July 13, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Hospitals may have a higher than expected readmission rate simply because they aren't properly billing cases that should be considered leaves of absence. Instead, hospitals are billing them as new admissions, which will trigger a readmission under the new rules, says Kimberly Anderwood Hoy, Esq., CPC, director of Medicare and compliance at HCPro, Inc., in Danvers, MA.
There are cases when an inpatient requires a medically necessary procedure that cannot be scheduled immediately. If a patient does not require inpatient care and is stable enough to return home, the hospital can place the patient on a leave of absence, which allows the patient to return home until the hospital can provide the procedure.
The Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 1, section 40.2.5, explains how providers can use leave of absence:
Hospitals may place a patient on a leave of absence when readmission is expected and the patient does not require a hospital level of care during the interim period. Examples could include, but are not limited to, situations where surgery could not be scheduled immediately, a specific surgical team was not available, bilateral surgery was planned, or when further treatment is indicated following diagnostic tests but cannot begin immediately. Institutional providers may not use the leave of absence billing procedure when the second admission is unexpected.
"The manual clearly says that leave of absence cannot be used to bill an unplanned readmission," says Deborah K. Hale, CCS, CCDS, president and CEO of Administrative Consultant Service, LLC, in Shawnee, OK.
Check out the August 2011 Case Management Monthly to learn more. You also can discover the benefits of becoming a Case Management Monthly subscriber.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Searched
