Mentor moment: Senators ask for a new ACO proposed rule
Case Management Weekly, June 1, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Seven U.S. senators believe the Accountable Care Organization (ACO) proposed rule will not only cost more than estimated but will not accomplish the program’s goals. They want CMS to try again.
CMS published the ACO proposed rule in the April 7 issue of the Federal Register. The ACO program allows groups of providers to work together to manage and coordinate care for Medicare beneficiaries through an ACO, according to CMS. An ACO may receive payments for shared savings if it meets certain quality performance standards.
Senators Tom Coburn (R-OK), Jon Kyl (R-AZ), Mike Crapo (R-ID), Mike Enzi (R-WY), John Cornyn (R-TX), Pat Roberts (R-KS), and Richard Burr (R-NC) wrote a letter to CMS asking the agency to scrap the current proposed rule and write a new one. The Senators say they have heard concerns from several leading healthcare institutions that believe the proposed rule will fail to accomplish the ACO program’s purpose. The senators also cite an American Hospital Association report which says implementing the ACO program will cost 10 times more than the proposed rule estimates.
The senators acknowledge that the ACO concept is a worthwhile goal, stating “An ACO model that can increase provider coordination and patient accountability would be a step in the right direction.” However, they believe “this proposed rule misses the target.”
Read and comment on the ACO proposed rule.
Click here to read the entire post, or share your thoughts about this topic.
Browse more blog posts at www.CaseManagementMentor.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Searched
