Mentor moment: Case management protocol is still debatable
Case Management Weekly, February 23, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
CMS’ reiterated in the special edition MLN Matters article SE1037 that inpatient screening tools such as InterQual® and Milliman®, may assist facilities in making patient status determinations, but the physician must make the ultimate call.
This presents a problem because according to many case managers, physicians do not know the inpatient care guidelines.
“Admission status does not affect physicians’ plan of care. They will treat the patient the same whether inpatient or outpatient observation. They want the case managers to make the decision for them since they are not familiar with the guidelines,” says Kathryn Bennett, RN BS CCM, director of case management at Indiana University Health Center in Bloomington.
Some case management departments have gone so far as to implement a case management protocol in which physicians perform an initial assessment of a patient and document their medical opinions. Physicians then write an order for the case manager to make the patient status decision using screening criteria. The physician then signs off on that decision.
Many departments have been hesitant to implement case management protocol because CMS will not endorse or condemn its use. Although SE1037 reiterates that patient status is a physician decision, it does not address case management protocol.
Case management departments interested in implementing a case management protocol should consult their quality improvement organizations (QIO).
Click here to read the entire post, or share your thoughts about this topic.
Browse more blog posts at www.CaseManagementMentor.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Searched
