News: One in ten hospital admissions is preventable
Case Management Weekly, November 10, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
In 2008, one out of every ten hospital stays was potentially preventable, according to a report issued by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
The AHRQ analyzed data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project using its Prevention Quality Indicators (PQI) to identify cases where the admission could have been prevented. The PQIs are a set of measures that can be used with hospital inpatient discharge data to identify quality of care for conditions for which good outpatient care can potentially prevent the need for hospitalization, or for which early intervention can prevent complications or more severe disease.
The AHRQ also sorted the data according to gender, income, payer, location, and age. The following are highlights from the study:
- Potentially preventable acute conditions accounted for 3.9% of all hospital stays, and potentially preventable chronic conditions accounted for 6.2%.
- The majority (60%) of potentially preventable hospital stays were for patients age 65 and older.
- Potentially preventable stays for acute conditions made up 3.4% of all urban hospital stays and 7.0% of all rural hospital stays.
- Hospital stays for patients living in the poorest communities were more likely to be potentially preventable (11.7%) than were stays for patients living in the wealthiest communities (8.1%).
- Nearly 10% of all uninsured stays were for potentially preventable conditions compared to 5.4% for privately insured or Medicaid-covered stays.
- Males were more likely than females to be hospitalized for a potentially preventable chronic condition (6.8% of male stays, 5.8% of female stays) and less likely to be hospitalized for a potentially preventable acute condition (3.6% of male stays, 4.0% of female stays).
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Searched