Effective physician advisors enhance documentation
Case Management Monthly, December 1, 2010
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Case Management Monthly.
The rules for making proper level-of-care decisions are lengthy and confusing, which makes the role of the physician advisor within the utilization review (UR) committee extremely critical, says Deborah K. Hale, CCS, president and CEO of Administrative Consultant Service, LLC, in Shawnee, OK.
Good physician advisors put the accuracy of UR processes on their shoulders, so they need to be very credible in their decision-making process and not just a rubber stamp for admission necessity protocols. They do not simply keep their nose to the admission criteria but are brave enough to step up and make a good clinical decision, Hale says.
Hale and Gregory Palega, MD, JD, physician advisor for Med Management in Vestavia Hills, AL, spoke about the physician advisor’s role in assigning level of care during the HCPro audio conference “Observation Services Versus Inpatient Admission: Assign Proper Level of Care and Prevent Denials.”
The following is one of the case studies Palega presented, which illustrates how an effective physician advisor can work with the attending physician, comb through the medical record, and enhance documentation to prevent reimbursement denials.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Case Management Monthly.
Related Products
-
Core Skills for Hospital Case Managers:
A guide to fundamental case management responsibilities, Core Skills for Hospital Case Managers serves as a training...
-
Condition code 44: Best Practices for a Compliant Process
Get advice on creating a process to identify the need for Condition Code 44 and communicating with other departments about...
-
The 2013 Medicare Compliance Forum: Las Vegas, NV
-
Level of Care Determinations for 2014: Las Vegas, NV
Attend the half-day seminar, Outpatient, Observation or Inpatient? Continuing to Walk the Tightrope of Regulatory Guidance...
-
OPPS and IPPS Reimbursement Fundamentals: Las Vegas, NV
Attend OPPS and IPPS Reimbursement Fundamentals, a half-day seminar on October 2nd in Las Vegas. Learn how CMS’ substantial...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Don’t forget the three checks in medication administration
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- What is the difference between an IPA and a medical group?
- Reimbursement for Facility and Professional Services in a Provider-Based Department by Gina M. Reese, Esq., RN
- What to include on the incident report
- CMS Revises Memo on Requirements to Reduce Risk of Legionella Infection
- Clearing up the confusion: CPT codes 76376 and 76377
- E-mailed
-
- CMS Revises Memo on Requirements to Reduce Risk of Legionella Infection
- Case study: Automating sepsis alerts at Harborview Medical Center
- Average resident salary increases
- Note from the Instructor: Provider-Based vs. Freestanding Locations: Financials Flip-flop with New Packaging
- Use modifiers -59, -91 to "explain" duplicate codes
- CMS replaces clinic E/M visit levels with single G-code
- Catheters Pose More Risks Than Just CAUTIs
- ECRI to take over critical online resource of evidence-based guidelines
- Documentation challenges for skin and dermatology coding
- Diving into CMS expectations for having water management policies and procedures
- Searched