Mentor moment: Offer physicians insight, not just 'education'
Case Management Weekly, October 20, 2010
Editor's Note: The following blog post originally appeared on the Association of Clinical Documentation Improvement Specialists (ACDIS) blog site.
I recently received a fortune cookie from a colleague. After reading the fortune several times, I realized the hidden message certainly has direct relevance to clinical documentation improvement (CDI) efforts affecting overall change in patterns of physician documentation. It read:
“Anyone can memorize things, but the important thing is to understand it.”
Most people remember reading college textbooks, listening to professorial lectures, taking notes, and regurgitating the information we supposedly learned on tests and final exams, as part of our endeavors of higher learning. We always seemed to ask ourselves why we were “learning” the majority of that rote information, anyway. It was difficult to appreciate and understand its practicality and usefulness.
Now, let’s look at CDI training and education. The majority of training, education, and CDI programs center around:
- understanding the MS-DRG system
- learning what a MCC/CC is
- gaining a practical sense and understanding of coding rules and policies governing principal and secondary condition selection/assignment
- learning how to review the record
- learning how to identify opportunities to improve clinical documentation and financial reimbursement
Finally, we learn how to enter the data into the tracking software for reporting purposes. If we’re lucky, we learn to track
- how many queries were left
- how many were responded to
- how many contained a positive response
- how often records were reviewed
- how much of a financial impact CDI has on hospital’s bottom line
The entire process is similar to the college experience in the sense that we “memorize” the steps of CDI, apply its principles consistently, and ensure we review the standard number of records each day in the name of that learning. Although I am not fundamentally against established “quotas” for record review, I do advocate for quality of chart reviews. These chart reviews work in tandem with CDI efforts to educate physicians, particularly to the extent that we are not repeatedly leaving the same queries day in and day out to determine the likes of acute blood loss anemia or the type of congestive heart failure.
Related Products
-
Competency Management in Long-Term Care:
This practical, easy-to-use manual and CD-ROM set provides the logic behind competency validation and offers guidance to...
-
The Long Term Care Restorative Nursing Desk Reference
This all-inclusive desk manual describes the clinical aspects of restorative nursing in detail and provides a much-needed...
-
Anatomy and Physiology for ICD-10 Coding E-learning Library
Is your coding team prepared for ICD-10? Coders must master the fundamentals of anatomy and physiology (A&P) before they...
-
The HIPAA Omnibus Rule
Understand the HIPAA Omnibus Rule and what you must do to ensure compliance
-
HIPAA Handbook for Behavioral Health Staff
This update will help covered entities and business associates provide their workforce members the training that is a...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Steps for maintaining patient privacy
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- Poor documentation: The consequences
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Tip of the week: Always report appropriate application code
- E-mailed
- Searched