Sneak peek: Should CMS eliminate observation services?
Case Management Weekly, October 13, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
CMS has seen an increase in the number of extended observation stays and wants to know why. That was the reason it gave for holding an August 24 listening session regarding the matter. The reason providers misuse observation services may not have been as interesting as the solution proposed by some callers—namely, that CMS should abolish observation services.
“I would love to see observation status eliminated. It has been the bane of my existence for the past four years since we got audited by the RAC [recovery audit contractor],” says Rhonda Karas, BSN, telemedicine coordinator at Trinity Hospital in Weaverville, CA.
Proper use of observation services is a struggle for providers, mainly because CMS has changed the rules several times over the past decade, says Michael Ross, MD, FACEP, medical director of observation medicine at Emory University in Atlanta and chair of the CMS APC Panel’s observation subcommittee. The most recent change came in 2008, when CMS decided to create a composite payment for observation services, which combined emergency or clinic visits into observation visit payment.
Observation services that extend beyond 48 hours hurt the Medicare beneficiary most. Beneficiaries pay high copayments for observation services and typically do not understand the difference between observation and inpatient care until they receive a bill.
Check out the November 2010 issue of Case Management Monthly to learn more. You also can discover the benefits of becoming a Case Management Monthly subscriber.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Related Products
-
Prevent Denials and Win Appeals:
Hospital case managers and directors of case management will find Prevent Denials and Win Appeals to be a valuable partner...
-
Medicare Compliance Forum: Orlando, FL
Attend the 2012 Medicare Compliance Forum to reduce your organization’s risk and exposure from government auditors...
-
Mastering the Three-Day Payment Window
During this 90 minute audio conference our expert speaker, Kimberly Anderwood Hoy provides a brief history of the rule...
-
Outpatient, Observation, or Inpatient?
Attend the half-day seminar, Outpatient, Observation or Inpatient? Walking the Tightrope of Regulatory Guidance, September...
-
OPPS and IPPS Reimbursement Fundamentals
Attend OPPS and IPPS Reimbursement Fundamentals, a half-day seminar on September 30 in Orlando. You'll learn to understand...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Searched