Protect patient information when communicating with payers
Case Management Monthly, September 1, 2010
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Case Management Monthly.
Case managers who perform utilization management (UM) typically communicate with payers, sending patient information to establish medical necessity. Based on the payer mix at a certain facility and patient volume, case managers disclose protected health information (PHI) every day.
A fundamental tenet of the HIPAA Privacy Rule requires hospitals and other covered entities that work with PHI to disclose only the minimum necessary information to accomplish a purpose, such as payment.
Minimum necessary generally must be applied by all covered entities. This includes healthcare providers (e.g., physicians and hospitals), healthcare payers, and healthcare clearinghouses, says Rebecca Herold, CISSP, CIPP, CISM, CISA, FLMI, privacy, security, and compliance consultant at Rebecca Herold & Associates, LLC, “The Privacy Professor”®, in Des Moines, IA.
“Although [minimum necessary] in almost all cases does not apply to treatment activities, providers must follow minimum necessary for operations and payment activities. Payers must understand and support this compliance obligation when working with the providers,” says Herold.
However, insurance companies are requesting increasingly more patient information—sometimes the entire patient record, according to Chris Simons, RHIA, director of UM, health information management, and privacy officer at Spring Harbor Hospital in Westbrook, ME. Simons considers this amount of information excessive, but there is not much she can do about it.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Case Management Monthly.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Searched
