Mentor moment: Addressing mental health issues improves patients' physical health
Case Management Weekly, February 3, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
The following article is adapted from HCPro’s resource for hospital case managers—www.CaseManagementMentor.com—a free blog dedicated to connecting hospital case managers to industry pacesetters, peers, and best practices.
Only five percent of the patient population is complex, yet they account for more than half of healthcare costs, according to Cartesian Solutions, Inc.™. Of that five percent, two-thirds have concurrent mental and physical health issues.
Poor communication between physicians who treat physical issues and providers who treat mental problems can cause complex patients to consume more resources. The lack of communication is due to the reimbursement model; it pays for physical treatments and mental treatments separately
Before the advent of managed care, physicians managed a patient’s physical and mental health problems. Some physicians owned treatment centers for the treatment of alcoholism, eating disorders, and other behavioral health issues, says Rebecca Perez, RN, CCM, CPUM, president and owner of Carative Health Solutions. However, payers realized that those resources were abused and have separated physical and mental health reimbursement, thereby limiting access to mental health treatment.
Limited access has caused a segment of the patient population to remain untreated, potentially causing them to seek more physical health treatment, thereby consuming more resources.
Perez is part of a growing movement addressing that issue by striving for a more integrated care management model that assesses patients’ physical and mental health issues simultaneously.
Click here to read the rest of this post, or share your thoughts on this topic.
Browse more blog posts at www.CaseManagementMentor.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Searched
