CMW Tip of the Week: Standardize physician level of care orders
Case Management Weekly, January 7, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
This week’s tip is provided by Deborah K. Hale, CCS.
When it comes to discerning level of care orders, free-hand orders are not always consistent from one physician to another, making it difficult to determine the physician’s intention.
An attempt to use standardized order sets to promote clarity of the physician’s order may be problematic if the format is poorly designed or if the level of care description is unique to your hospital. Orders such as “admit to medical short stay” (an internal description representing observation status for medical patients) would not likely be recognized as an appropriate observation order by an outside auditor.
For best results, checkboxes allowing the physician to choose the intended level of care will improve the level of care order accuracy if they are easily visualized and the opportunity to select the level of care is large enough to identify the physician’s selection. Wording should be consistent with Medicare/Medicaid regulatory guidelines and admission screening criteria sets:
- Admit as inpatient
- Admit to observation status
- Outpatient status (outpatient surgery, outpatient blood transfusion, etc.)
Computerized order entry should be designed to require the physician to select the level of care before proceeding with any other orders. To avoid any confusion, the level of care choices should reflect CMS required terminology described above.
Have a tip or tool you’d like to share? Or maybe a question for our experts? E-mail it to editor Julie McGinley at jmcginley@hcpro.com.Your thoughts could be featured in the next issue of Case Management Weekly!
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Comments
1 comments on “CMW Tip of the Week: Standardize physician level of care orders ”
- leslee.hughes (10/24/2011 at 11:49 AM)
- I am looking for all literature Regulations, laws, whatever!) regarding physician orders establishing patient status (InPT vs. OutPT) PRIOR to the start of surgery.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- HealthDataInsights posts new issues for medical necessity claims
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- Q&A: Incidental disclosures and patient privacy
- Sneak Peek: Effort underway to establish caseload benchmarks
- New FAQ posted on storing laryngoscope blades
- Tip: Perform your own internal investigation prior to government audit
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA 5010 deadline extended, but threat remains, says AMA
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- E-mailed
-
- Running an effective peer review committee meeting
- HIPAA Q&A: Flu shot requirement for hospital employees
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HHS task force: Consider privacy, security with text messages
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Tip: Correctly code bilateral pain management procedures
- 2012 CPT code changes for ASCs: Shoulder and knee scopes and pain management
- COT basics to best
- Documentation and coding for toxic metabolic encephalopathy
- Guidance and tact key to compliant, effective physician queries
- Searched
