CMW Sneak Peek: Data collection, analysis lead to positive outcomes
Case Management Weekly, December 10, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Recovery audit contractors (RAC), present on admission, and January’s loss of the Program to Evaluate Payment Patterns Electronic Report (PEPPER) signal an urgent need for hospitals to take control of data collection to determine improvement opportunities and influence physician behavior.
At Underwood-Memorial Hospital (UMH) in Woodbury, NJ, the case management and health information management (HIM) departments work together to analyze and scrutinize data for opportunities to change or enhance processes. Using data in this way has helped identify improvements and better educate and influence physicians.
UMH uses 3M’s comprehensive HDM system for collecting and analyzing data. “Even though we’re not getting the PEPPER reports anymore, we’re still using [the information it provided] as a guide going forward,” says Lisa Nutt, RN, BSN, CCM, director of case management and social work at UMH. “We have a very robust benchmarking program which can slice and dice length-of-stay case-mix index by DRG and by physician.”
“We looked at our severity of illness and our mortality rates by certain DRGs,” says Nutt. “What we found is we really did have an opportunity to improve our documentation.” The data showed physician documentation did not accurately demonstrate how sick patients were when compared to case-mix indexes. With the data, Nutt says physicians responded well because they could clearly see the problem.
Check out the December 2008 issue of Case Management Monthly to get the full story, and discover all the benefits of being a Case Management Monthly subscriber!
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Comments
0 comments on “CMW Sneak Peek: Data collection, analysis lead to positive outcomes ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Searched
