CMW Sneak Peek: Manage your fear of the RAC
Case Management Weekly, November 12, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
CMS’ Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program elicits feelings of fear, but Brenda Keeling, RN, CPHQ, CPUR, president and owner of Patient Response in Milburn, OK, says fear is the last thing you should feel when faced with a RAC audit.
Remember that RACs cannot randomly select claims or target one “solely because it is a high-dollar claim,” according to the draft Statement of Work. A RAC can only “target a claim because it is a high-dollar claim and contains other information that leads the RAC to believe it is likely to contain an [over- or underpayment].”
Nancy Hirschl, BS, CCS, president of Hirschl & Associates in Laguna Niguel, CA, and an HCPro RAC Report advisory board member, says the “other information” could include:
- Diagnosis codes that may be incorrectly coded based on RAC experience in the private health insurance arena
- Diagnoses that often present physician documentation insufficiencies
- Procedure codes that do not correlate with diagnosis codes
- Procedure codes that may indicate inappropriate site of service/inpatient status
- Incongruent charge to payment comparison
- The belief that the claim payment was not consistent with Medicare payment policy
Hirschl says you should identify areas the RAC may target before the RAC arrives, develop strategies to defend your data, and improve case management protocols.
Check out the November 2008 issue of Case Management Monthly to get the full story, and discover all the benefits of being a Case Management Monthly subscriber!
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Comments
0 comments on “CMW Sneak Peek: Manage your fear of the RAC ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Searched
