CMW Sneak Peak: A brief assessment tool can improve productivity and patient care
Case Management Weekly, July 23, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Until January 2007, the University of North Carolina (UNC) Health Care System in Chapel Hill was struggling with a case management assessment process that didn’t meet its needs. The majority of assessment data at the 728-bed academic tertiary care hospital was documented in handwritten progress notes that were time-consuming to create and cumbersome to navigate.
“We were doing assessments, of sorts, they just weren’t measurable or consistent or readily available to the rest of the healthcare team,” says Beverly Wagner, BSN, RN, CCM, clinical care management educator at UNC Health Care.
Wagner knew any assessment tool she created had to be easy and quick enough to use to ensure universal buy-in from all departments. So she focused on creating the brief assessment tool (BAT), an electronic form that guides staff through interviewing incoming patients and helps them easily document necessary information by simply clicking a mouse.
The paper BAT received excellent reviews from trainees for its:
- Question-and-answer format, which helps guide the interviews
- List of typical responses scripted to avoid repetitive documentation
- Consistency in topics covered and information documentation
“The staff is happy to use it. I expected for there to be some improvement, but not a 300% sustained increase in measurable assessments,” says Wagner. “To be able to have them like the process and feel like the tool works for them exceeded my wildest expectation.”
Check out the July 2008 issue of Case Management Monthly to get the full story, and check out all the benefits of being a Case Management Monthly subscriber!
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Comments
0 comments on “CMW Sneak Peak: A brief assessment tool can improve productivity and patient care ”
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Searched
