Revised ABN should cause less confusion for patients
Case Management Weekly, May 21, 2008
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
On March 3, CMS released the new ABN. This form, also known as the ABN-R-131, will be used for all Part B provider and supplier services, making it essential for all case managers to be aware of the change so they can effectively communicate with patients and providers.
The new ABN can be used immediately, although it is not required until September 1. The biggest benefits to hospitals are that it replaces the existing ABN-G and ABN-L and that it may be used for voluntary notifications, in place of the Notice of Exclusion from Medicare Benefits.
Check out the May 2008 issue of Case Management Monthly to get the full story, and discover all the benefits of being a Case Management Monthly subscriber.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Case Management Weekly!
Comments
0 comments on “Revised ABN should cause less confusion for patients ”
Related Products
-
Case Management Weekly
Case Management Weekly is a free e-mail newsletter that offers news, resources, and Q&As to help case managers from all...
-
Case Management Monthly
This newsletter offers case studies, best practices, and how-to analysis to help case managers move patients through the...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Searched