Surgical site marking: Standardization key in preventing errors
Accreditation Connection, September 3, 2007
Approximately five years ago, the healthcare industry began experiencing an increase in reporting of wrong-site surgical errors to the point that such errors became the single-most reported sentinel event in hospitals across the country. In response, The Joint Commission developed its Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure, and Wrong Person SurgeryTM soon after, which was implemented nationwide. Yet wrong-site surgery remains a troublesome issue to this day, causing continued confusion in many facilities.
In numerous cases, wrong-site surgical errors stem from a lack of standardization throughout the facility.
"The biggest breakdown isn't in the OR but in areas where procedures are done outside the OR, particularly in the ER, ICU, and ambulatory care clinics," says Kurt Patton, MS, RPh, principal of Patton Healthcare Consulting in Glendale, AZ.
Access the full story in the September issue of Briefings on The Joint Commission; access is free for subscribers, nonsubscribers can sign up for a 30-day free trial of BOJExtra! or purchase a copy of the story for $10 by clicking here.
Related Products
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
-
The Joint Commission Mock Tracer Made Simple
This updated edition of our annual best-seller includes new tools and case studies of successful tracers from facilities...
-
Staffing Effectiveness Data:
You've spent an enormous amount of time, money, and effort collecting staffing effectiveness data - and you can still put it...
-
Simplifying Nursing Documentation
Implement a "two-form" solution that will cut nursing documentation in half while fully complying with Joint Commission...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Searched