Researchers recommend expanding 'do-not-use' lists
Accreditation Connection, September 3, 2007
The Washington Post reports that a study, published in the September 2007 Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, recommends hospitals expand do-not-use abbreviation rules and continue to enforce existing rules to make sure improper abbreviations are not used.
Five percent of 30,000 medication errors reported to the national Medmarx database between 2004 and 2006 were the result of errors involving shorthand. The most common errors involved U (units) which can often be mistaken for zero, and QD, often mistaken for QOD.
More information can be found here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Searched
