Revised standards designed to align with CMS
Briefings on The Joint Commission, September 1, 2007
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
The Joint Commission recently announced revisions to four accreditation standards that hospitals are expected to comply with immediately-three of which directly align with recent CMS revisions to the hospital Conditions of Participation. Among the affected standards are restraint and seclusion; procurement and donation of organs and other tissues; time frames for history and physical (H&P) exams; and emergency management standards. "These changes are having a lot of impact across the country as facilities face the survey process," said Bud Pate, REHS, practice director of clinical operations and improvement and director of West Coast operations for The Greeley Company, a division of HCPro, Inc., in Marblehead, MA, the publisher of this newsletter. Pate spoke during the recent HCPro audioconference "Comply with Revised Joint Commission Standards to Align with CMS: Immediate changes to affect restraint, seclusion, H&Ps, and emergency management."
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
Related Products
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
-
The Joint Commission Mock Tracer Made Simple
This updated edition of our annual best-seller includes new tools and case studies of successful tracers from facilities...
-
Staffing Effectiveness Data:
You've spent an enormous amount of time, money, and effort collecting staffing effectiveness data - and you can still put it...
-
Simplifying Nursing Documentation
Implement a "two-form" solution that will cut nursing documentation in half while fully complying with Joint Commission...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Searched