One year later, hospital is still busy gathering data
Accreditation Connection, May 28, 2007
For anyone who thinks the accreditation process gets easy after the unannounced survey is over, think again. Since having its first unannounced survey in May 2006, Huntington Hospital in Pasadena, CA, has been as busy as ever in dealing with overturning RFIs, handling evidence of standards compliance (ESC), and collecting data and submitting reports for measures of success (MOS).
That doesn't even include all of the work that's gone into finishing the hospital's PPR and keeping staff members motivated to ensure compliance without the threat of a survey. "The survey ended, and we just went back to work making sure everything was in order," says Marty Waskul, project manager at Huntington, a 522-bed community hospital. "We put a heavy focus on adjusting policies, changing forms, and educating staff based off what we learned during the survey."
The entire ESC process took the hospital from May to November 2006 to maintain compliance with the six RFIs the hospital received and complete the MOS report, after which staff members went directly to work on the PPR, using many of the same tools, self assessments, and grading processes the hospital used to prepare for the actual survey, Waskul says. "The six RFIs were all on the top 2006 challenging standards list, so they aren't easy problems to fix. We wanted to make sure the solutions were ones that would actually work and not just plug a gap."
Access the full story in the May issue of Briefings on The Joint Commission; access is free for subscribers, nonsubscribers can sign up for a 30-day free trial of BOJExtra! or purchase a copy of the story for $10 by clicking here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Searched
