New rule for hospital discharges takes effect July 1
Briefings on The Joint Commission, March 1, 2007
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
Rule sets forth requirements for notifying Medicare beneficiaries
CMS has made changes to its notice delivery process rule after receiving hundreds of responses aimed at balancing existing hospital discharge processes with a beneficiary's right to be informed of his or her discharge appeal rights. The new final rule, "Notification of Hospital Discharge Appeal Rights," entered into the Federal Register in November 2006 and sets forth requirements for how hospitals must notify Medicare beneficiaries who are hospital inpatients about their hospital discharge appeal rights.
Notice is required both for original Medicare beneficiaries and for beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare health plans. The rule takes effect July 1.
The most notable change is that you must implement a separate new discharge notice. The rule requires that hospitals use a revised version of the Important Message from Medicare (IM), an existing statutorily required notice, to explain the discharge rights.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Searched
