Briefings on The Joint Commission, March 2007
Briefings on The Joint Commission, March 1, 2007
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
Inside:
GAO report finds that Joint Commission/JCR firewall okay
Q&A with Kurt Patton
The Joint Commission releases 147 new or revised FAQs for 2007 National Patient Safety Goals
Compliance with MM.3.20 comes down to following hospital policy for communicating med orders
Two surveys in one year show consistency in The Joint Commission's survey process, one hospital reports
New rule for hospital discharges takes effect July 1
GAO report finds that Joint Commission/JCR firewall okay
A U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) report finds no fault with the separation between The Joint Commission's accreditation operations and the publishing and consulting operations of its affiliate, Joint Commission Resources, Inc. (JCR).
"Despite The Joint Commission's control over JCR, the two organizations have taken steps designed to protect facility-specific information," reads the GAO report, released on January 16. The report was prepared at the request of Representative Pete Stark (D-CA) and Senators Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and Max Baucus (D-MT), although Baucus' name was left off the final report.
According to the report, the organizations created a "firewall" in 1987, policies to establish a barrier between The Joint Commission and JCR to prevent "improper sharing" of information. "For example, the firewall is intended to prevent JCR from sharing the names of hospital clients with The Joint Commission," the report reads.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Searched
