A wider view of hand-off communication
Briefings on The Joint Commission, June 1, 2006
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
One facility ties a plan of care document to the process
After reading this article, you will be able to
1. -define the JCAHO's requirement for hand-off communication
2. -describe the benefits of having a single plan of care for each patient that is used by all units
3. -identify the JCAHO's provision-of-care standards that directly address nursing initial assessments and plans of care
Hand-off communication goes beyond the shift-to-shift, nurse-to-nurse report, according to clinical interdisciplinary team managers at Youville Hospital & Rehabilitation Center in Cambridge, MA.
So they developed a form to help them comply not only with the JCAHO's 2006 National Patient Safety Goal for hand-off communication, but to follow-up on all of their patients' initial plans of care.
"It's our ongoing hand-off for everybody," says Janet Hosta, RN, MSN, director of professional development at Youville. "We consider it to be a hand-off because it's in the record and it's reviewed by anybody taking care of the patient." (See pp. 8-9 of the PDF of this issue for a copy of Youville's form.)
Addressing a problem
When patients are admitted to Youville, staff fill out a six-page initial interdisciplinary care form that individualizes a patient's plan of care.
The problem was that the form wasn't revisited, Hosta says.
"We were not going back to the original care plan later [during the patient's stay] to update the goals," she says. "So the care plan was great on admission, but it didn't capture the sense of where we were going, and goal achievement is critical to patient progress and discharge."
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Searched
