One way to conduct the annual risk assessment for IC.2.10
Accreditation Connection, May 8, 2006
Infection risks vary by hospital due to factors such as patient populations, surrounding communities, services and programs offered, etc. In addition, infection risks can change with time, which is part of the rationale to conduct the assessments annually, according to the JCAHO's
standard, IC.2.10.
Infection control practitioners must consider all of these differences among hospitals when designing risk-analysis programs and treatment and care services. One way to do this is through a simple spreadsheet, says Joan Brake, director of performance improvement for Hospital Partners of America in Charlotte, NC. The company consults with medical centers that create risk-analysis programs and also develops and operates hospitals in partnership with physicians nationwide.
Brake designed a spreadsheet with accompanying directions that hospitals can use to develop a risk analysis. She reiterates the JCAHO's view that each hospital has unique characteristics that it must incorporate into the analysis.
"Edit [the spreadsheet] for your area of the city and your facility and what you are seeing," Brake says.
Brake's sample spreadsheet lists organisms, diseases, and other issues. Hospital staff rate each of them by likelihood of occurrence, potential risk for death or injury, and the hospital's ability to respond to each issue.
For example, some hospitals may be in flood zones, which present a specific type of infectious risk. Others might have higher-than-average rates of tuberculosis in the community or resistant organisms (e.g., MRSA).
The IC program in the hospital should reflect what the facility has encountered, Brake says.
Adapted from an article that appears in the May 2006 issue of Briefings on Infection Control.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Searched
