Have a process in place to address patient grievances
Briefings on The Joint Commission, April 1, 2006
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
Learning objectives: After reading this article, you will be able to
How hospitals address patient rights is a key area highlighted by both the JCAHO's standards and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' (CMS) Conditions of Participation ( CoP ). But a new area of focus for CMS in 2006 is how hospitals handle and resolve patient grievances.
Both CMS and the JCAHO require that inpatients and outpatients are informed about their rights. JCAHO standards are more specific about rights centered around care and treatment and cultural, spiritual, psychosocial, and personal dignity. The JCAHO also addresses patient responsibility information, whereas CMS does not.
Hospitals must have a formal patient grievance process and mechanism that has been approved by the organization's governing board. The CMS interpretative guidelines define a patient grievance as "a written or verbal complaint by a patient, or the patient's representative, regarding the patient's care, abuse or neglect, issues related to the hospital's compliance with CMS Hospital CoPs, or a Medicare beneficiary billing complaint related to rights and limitations."
Billing issues are not considered grievances unless the complaint also contains issues about patient service or care. The hospital must inform the patient of the grievance process and provide a written response to each patient's grievance.
If the grievance will not be resolved or the investigation has not been or will not be completed within seven days, the hospital should inform the patient or his or her representative that the hospital is still working to resolve the grievance and will follow up with a written response within a stated number of days based on the hospital's grievance policy. The hospital must attempt to resolve all grievances in a timely manner.
In the past, hospitals "didn't always tell patients that we did something negligent," says Sue Dill Calloway, RN, MSN, JD, hospital risk management director at OHIC Insurance in Columbus, OH. With the new CMS revisions, that has changed.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on The Joint Commission.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Searched
