Hospitals reevaluating emergency plan in the wake of Katrina
Accreditation Connection, December 16, 2005
A survey conducted by VHA, Inc., a national healthcare alliance based in Irving, TX, shows that hospitals across the country are reevaluating their disaster recovery plans as a result of Katrina's aftermath.
Nearly half of those polled plan to modify their evacuation plans, seek alternative communication systems, and prepare for extended periods of self-sufficiency, according to the survey. Larger hospitals are more likely to revise their disaster plans, the survey found. More than 350 hospitals responded to the VHA survey.
"Katrina showed how fragile yet vital our technology and supply infrastructures are and how long hospitals may have to operate on their own in times of major disasters," said Curt Nonomaque, VHA president and CEO, in a statement. "Many hospitals are taking this time to evaluate their disaster plans to determine whether they are prepared to face similar crises."
According to VHA, modifications that hospitals are considering include
- establishing formal arrangements to receive food by helicopter
- adding a section to their disaster plans about how to treat patients when the hospital has no electricity or functioning communication devices
- identifying communications systems other than cell phones
- adding a better patient tracking system
- exploring alternate evacuation sites that are on higher ground
- developing a policy for volunteers during disasters
- purchasing more flashlights and installing rechargeable ones in the treatment rooms
VHA also gathered practical tips from its member hospitals on emergency preparation. You can find other helpful disaster response information on VHA's Web site at www.vha.com.
Adapted from the December issue of Briefings on Hospital Safety.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Searched
