Are isolators acceptable alternatives for USP 797 compliance?
Accreditation Connection, December 12, 2005
Knowing the risk level of compounded sterile preparations and the proper environmental requirements will help determine whether a hospital can purchase barrier isolators to supplant a clean room and comply with U.S. Pharmacopeia (USP) Chapter 797.
USP 797 describes barrier isolators--sterile boxes with holes for staff to put their hands through to compound preparations--as an acceptable alternative to building a clean room. But they may only be acceptable if they meet certain requirements.
A well-designed barrier isolator can serve as an alternative to a laminar airflow workbench because it provides an ISO Class 5 environment for aseptic processing, USP spokesperson Sherrie Borden says.
The ISO class refers to the number of particles present in the air for the environment to be considered sterile. The basic equipment required to comply with USP 797 is an ISO Class 5 laminar airflow workbench, which is the hood under which staff prepare sterile compounds, says Steve MacArthur, a safety consultant with The Greeley Company, the Marblehead, MA-based consulting division of HCPro.
"When it comes to barrier isolators, they can be used as an alternative so long as they meet the ISO class specifications for environmental control," MacArthur says.
Adapted from the December issue of Hospital Pharmacy Regulation Report.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Searched
