Six steps for submitting a clarification to JCAHO
Accreditation Connection, April 18, 2005
Hospitals continue to struggle with writing clarifications of how they comply with a standard despite being cited during a survey as "not compliant."
What is it?
A clarification is similar to an evidence of standards compliance (ESC) in that it explains how the hospital complies with the standard for which it received a requirement for improvement (RFI). However, with a clarification you explain in detail how you do comply with the standard.
"Basically you're saying, 'at the time of survey, we were in compliance, and here's how,'" says Bud Pate, REHS, practice director of clinical operations improvement for The Greeley Company, a division of HCPro, Inc., which publishes BOJ.
Resist saying a surveyor was wrong, advises Steven W. Bryant, practice director of accreditation and credentialing and privileging for The Greeley Company. "Even if they are wrong, it's your word against a surveyor's. Just address the issue aggressively with the JCAHO. Do your best to give evidence and show how you were meeting the intent of the standard," he says.
Hospitals that receive up to nine RFIs have 90 days after survey to craft a response to the JCAHO, in the form of either clarifications or ESC, 45 days for hospitals surveyed after July 1, 2005.
But hospitals with 10 or more RFIs have just 10 working days to submit any clarifying information once the JCAHO complete its internal review process of its survey report.
To learn the six steps to writing a clarification, click here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Oxygen Cylinder Storage Requirements
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Understand the spine to code back procedures correctly
- Cut through the confusion related to different kinds of wound debridements
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
