Communication breakdown: Sentinel Event Alert calls out bad patient handoffs
Briefings on Accreditation and Quality, January 1, 2018
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Accreditation and Quality.
In September, The Joint Commission published Sentinel Event Alert 58, warning healthcare organizations about the dangers of inadequate handoff communications. When a patient changes hands, there’s a big risk that key treatment information will be garbled, forgotten, or not passed on.
A patient handoff (also known as transitioning) constitutes both the act of passing a patient between caregivers and the information exchanged between the sender (i.e., the person giving away the patient) and the receiver (i.e., the person taking the patient). These transfers can be as dramatic as airlifting a patient to a specialty hospital and telling the EMTs that the patient thinks she can fly and will try to jump out of the helicopter, or as mundane as a nurse ending her shift and telling her replacement the patient has been taken off a certain medicine.
No matter how dramatic or anticlimactic handoffs may seem, they are crucial for a smooth care transition. Despite that, The Joint Commission has found they’re a continual weak point in healthcare.
“Potential for patient harm—from the minor to the severe—is introduced when the receiver gets information that is inaccurate, incomplete, not timely, misinterpreted, or otherwise not what is needed,” The Joint Commission wrote in the alert. “When hand-off communication fails, many factors are involved, such as healthcare provider training and expectations, language barriers, cultural or ethnic considerations, and inadequate, incomplete or nonexistent documentation, to name just a few.”
Nan Tomsky, MN, RN, CPHRM, a principal consultant at Compass Clinical Consulting, explains that the information provided during a handoff is key in ensuring a seamless transition of patient care.
“Failure to properly transfer knowledge about the patient can result in serious outcomes when the receiving caregiver is ignorant of critical information,” she says. “Needed medications may be omitted, key symptoms/indications of patient changes can be missed, and patients can fall and suffer serious injuries among other outcomes.”
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Accreditation and Quality.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Complications from immobility by body system
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- E-mailed
-
- Capturing start and stop times for infusions
- CDC alert: Screen for international travel as Ebola cases increase
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Q&A: Utilization Review Committee Membership
- Life Safety Code Q&A: Ambulatory care soiled utility room
- Leadership training for charge nurses
- Helping Charge Nurses understand their leadership role (Part 2 of 3)
- Five ways to safeguard your patients' valuables
- Developing a Fall-Prevention Program
- Searched