CIHQ forges its way as an accreditation alternative
Briefings on Accreditation and Quality, February 27, 2017
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Accreditation and Quality.
Hospitals seeking accreditation have more options than ever. The Joint Commission, DNV, and AAHHS (which acquired HFAP in 2015) are all well established, but don’t count out the Center for Improvement in Healthcare Quality (CIHQ).
CIHQ was founded in 1999 as a hospital consulting company. Based in McKinney, Texas, the company still does consulting work for 330 hospitals nationwide on standards and regulation compliance. After 12 years of helping hospitals with their CMS and Joint Commission accreditation, CIHQ became an accreditor itself in 2011.
Six years later and dozens of accredited hospitals later, CIHQ is in the midst of renewing its CMS deeming status for an anticipated six years. Richard Curtis, RN, MS, HACP, is CEO of CIHQ and a nationally recognized expert on the CMS Conditions of Participation (CoP) and Certification & Survey Process.
History
CIHQ didn’t consider applying for deemed status until 2011, after noticing puzzling patterns in their hospitals compliance results. Whenever CMS would do a validation or complaint survey, he says, the outcomes would be significantly different than those The Joint Commission came up with. Eventually, CIHQ realized that the discrepancy was due to a lack of alignment between The Joint Commission and CMS. After that, it started looking for ways to solve the problem.
“We started internally, looking how we could better help our hospitals,” Curtis says. “And we had some members say, ‘Why can’t you [CIHQ] accredit us?’ They liked our process and how we did business with them. So we went back and said, ‘Well, what would it take to do this?’ ”
CIHQ called CMS to inquire about how to become a deemed accreditor, Curtis says, and the agency was surprisingly receptive of the idea. In August 2013, CIHQ was made a confirmed accreditor with a four-year license.
“It’s been very slow growth,” he notes. “I’ll be the first to admit that. It’s a hard field to break into and to get the industry to even become aware there’s another accreditor; much less switching from Joint Commission, DNV, etc. We have about 45 hospitals we’ve accredited, pick up about one each month on average. It’s slow but steady growth and we’re currently in our reapplication phase to CMS to get renewed.”
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Accreditation and Quality.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- What to include on the incident report
- Code diagnoses and outpatient treatment for PTSD
- Complications from immobility by body system
- Understanding nursing roles in quality improvement
- E-mailed
-
- Patient care orders/protocols: What do the regulations say?
- Refine the terms: Understand unbilled accounts and DNFB
- Q: What are the requirements of an agency's professional advisory committee (PAC)?
- Q/A: Reporting L code and CPT code for splinting
- Q&A: Charging for drug administration during urgent care visit
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- Food and drink in patient care areas
- Coding meconium aspiration
- CMS final rule clarifies that medical staff can extend beyond physicians
- Searched