Joint Commission shifts position on texting medical orders again
Briefings on Accreditation and Quality, February 7, 2017
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Accreditation and Quality.
The Joint Commission has reversed its position on the use of text messaging to send patient care orders, once again banning the practice months after saying they were acceptable
The original ban had been put in place in 2011 because at the time there were concerns over:
1. Private medical information being sent through unencrypted texting services
2. A lack of a way to verify who was actually sending the text
In the May 2016 Perspectives, the accreditor wrote that technology had improved enough so that the twin issues of verification and encryption weren’t concerns anymore. The announcement listed various conditions for appropriate text messaging platforms, policies, and procedures.
When announced, there had been some support for the ban’s repeal. A Medscape poll found that 74% of physicians and 66% of nurses strongly or somewhat favored the idea of texting medical orders. And a study published in the Journal of General Internal Medicine found that switching between paging to texting in a hospital cut its average length of stay by 0.6 days a month.
However, by June The Joint Commission and CMS announced that they were temporarily reinstating the ban while they worked on additional guidance. By December, The Joint Commission announced that it was placing the ban back into effect.
This is an excerpt from a member only article. To read the article in its entirety, please login or subscribe to Briefings on Accreditation and Quality.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- E-mailed
-
- Sneak peek: Evidence-based practices can help improve, enhance case management skills
- Q&A: Pressure ulcer POA code confusion resolved
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- Keyes Q&A: Generator lighting, fire dampers, eyewash stations, ISLM fire drills
- Including 46600 in E/M leveling systems
- How to get reimbursed for restorative nursing
- Fetal non-stress tests represent important part of maternal and fetal health
- Coronavirus vaccination: 4 best practices for communicating with patients
- Coding Clinic reiterates guidelines for provider documentation
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- Searched