Tiny percentage of physician groups earned CMS value-based care bonus
Accreditation Insider, March 15, 2016
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Accreditation Insider!
It’s the second year for CMS’s value-based payment modifier (VBM) program, a part of the Affordable Care Act using Medicare reimbursements to encourage high-quality and cost-effective care. However, the number of physician groups rewarded for their scores on the Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) was under a tenth of a fraction of 1%. As for punishment, a physician group was nearly 200 times more likely to be sanctioned for not submitting their quality data than actually having a poor PQRS score.
Only 128 out of the 13,813 physician groups eligible for the program received a 16% or 32% increase to Medicare reimbursements. That represents only 0.009% of medical groups, or 4,300 physicians, to benefit from the program. The number punished under the program was even smaller, with 59 physician groups (0.004%) receiving a pay decrease of 1% to 2% because their PQRS scores weren’t high enough.
The large bulk (59%) of physician groups saw no change to their reimbursement rates, while 39% received a 2% pay cut for failing to submit their PQRS data.
“These results show that getting a reimbursement increase is akin to winning the lottery,” Anders Gilberg, senior vice president for the Medical Group Management Association, said in a Modern Healthcare interview. “This just isn't a meaningful system.”
Last year, the VBM only applied to group practices with more than 100 eligible professionals, and this year it expanded to include practices with 10 or more professionals. Next year, the program will be applied to all group practices in the U.S. with anyone not submitting PQRS data being penalized.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Accreditation Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- Clearing up the confusion: CPT codes 76376 and 76377
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- E-mailed
-
- Coronavirus vaccination: 4 best practices for communicating with patients
- Grievances, Complaints, and Patients’ Rights
- Including 46600 in E/M leveling systems
- How to get reimbursed for restorative nursing
- Five keys to creating a CHF disease management program
- Fetal non-stress tests represent important part of maternal and fetal health
- Coding, billing, and documentation tips for teaching physicians, interns, residents, and students
- Coding tip: Know how to correctly code each procedure an otolaryngologist can perform on turbinates
- Coding Clinic reiterates guidelines for provider documentation
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- Searched