Hospital acquired conditions rates level off; areas still in need of improvement
Accreditation Insider, December 8, 2015
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Accreditation Insider!
The Department of Health & Human Services released a study showing that the rate Hospital Acquired Conditions (HACs) has leveled off after three years of decline. In 2010, 145 out of every 1,000 patients either contracted a disease or preventable injury during their stay at a hospital. HAC rates have fallen 17% since then, leveling off in 2013 and 2014 at 121 HACs per 1,000. This represents 2.1 million fewer HAC cases, $19.8 billion saved in healthcare costs and 87,000 patients not dying due to a HAC over the course of four years.
The report looked at the national rates for 27 specific complications to determine the frequency of HACs. The most noticeable drops in HAC have been in surgical site infections (18%), urinary catheter infections (38%) and central line infections (72%).
However, there were areas in need of improvement the report found. The rates of several types of HACs have remained the same over the past four years, with some complications became more frequent:
• Patient falls
• Catheters puncturing arteries during surgery
• Adverse drug reactions and complications during childbirth
• Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteria (MRSA) infection
• Pneumonia cases in patients breathing through mechanical ventilators
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Accreditation Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Residency coordinators’ responsibilities
- RPA Subscriber Exclusive: February issue of Residency Program Alert now available
- Study: Shorter shifts reduces residents’ attentional failures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Editor’s note
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- Prevent dehydration with nursing interventions
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- E-mailed
-
- White Paper: Postacute CDI: An Introduction to Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals
- Use modifiers -59, -91 to "explain" duplicate codes
- Tim Porter-O'Grady sounds off
- Q: Can you clarify the reporting of dates on the plan of care for diagnosis onset and exacerbation?
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- Fracture coding in ICD-10-CM requires greater specificity
- Eight tips to improve MRI throughput
- Searched