Study finds performance trends tied to Joint Commission accreditation
Accreditation Connection, October 14, 2011
A recent study published in the Journal of Hospital Medicine found that hospitals accredited by The Joint Commission, examined in the study, tended to have better baseline performance in 2004 than non-accredited hospitals. Accredited hospitals had larger gains over time, and were significantly more likely to have high performance in 2008 on 13 out of 16 standardized clinical performance measures and all summary scores.
The study used performance data, obtained using publicly available CMS Hospital Compare data, for 2004 and 2008 from U.S. acute care and critical access hospitals, augmented with Joint Commission performance data.
The study reported that while, in the early days of public reporting, Joint Commission-accredited hospitals already outperformed non-accredited hospitals on publicly reported quality measures, these differences became significantly more pronounced over five years of observation.
For more information on the study, click here.
Related Products
-
Emergency Management Compliance Manual
This binder and CD-ROM set helps you cut through the confusion related to the new emergency management chapter of the...
-
Environment of Care Compliance Manual, Fourth Edition
This valuable resource not only updates the standards, it also offers tips and advice to stay compliant with new and...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
-
Hospital Safety Center
Improve compliance with hospital safety standards from The Joint Commission, OSHA, and other regulators with this...
-
Healthcare Life Safety Compliance
Learn Life Safety Code tips and interpretations for healthcare facilities with this in-depth monthly resource.
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Cut through the confusion related to different kinds of wound debridements
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Coding concurrent therapy under the MDS 3.0
- Searched