Joint Commission continues telemedicine discussion with CMS
Accreditation Connection, August 12, 2011
The Joint Commission stated this week that is has submitted proposed changes to its standards related to telemedicine to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
After reviewing the standards and Elements of Performance dealing with telemedicine, it was determined that some minor revisions still remained to bring Joint Commission requirements in line with CMS Conditions of Participation. According to The Joint Commission’s most recent statement, these changes are expected to be minor and will be communicated to the field as soon as they are available, most likely in the fall, The Joint Commission states.
These changes effect hospital and critical access hospital programs. Complete details can be found on The Joint Commission’s website.
Related Products
-
Information Management and Record of Care, Treatment, and Services:
The new, fully updated Information Management and Record of Care, Seventh Edition, is a comprehensive guide to the most...
-
The Joint Commission Mock Tracer Made Simple
This updated edition of our annual best-seller includes new tools and case studies of successful tracers from facilities...
-
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Leadership
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Leadership breaks down the Joint Commission’s leadership requirements into easy-to-understand...
-
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Performance Improvement
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Performance Improvement breaks down The Joint Commission’s performance improvement...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Cut through the confusion related to different kinds of wound debridements
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Coding concurrent therapy under the MDS 3.0
- Searched