Joint Commission aligns patient visitation rights requirements with CMS
Accreditation Connection, July 15, 2011
The Joint Commission has updated two Elements of Performance (EP) under its Patient Rights (RI) chapter to bring requirements for patient visitation more in line with CMS requirements. These changes announced July 13, 2011, were retroactively effective as of July 1, 2011.
Both changes were made under standard RI.01.01.01, which states that the hospital must promote, respect, and promote patient rights. EP 1 requires hospitals to have written policies on patient rights, and a new note for hospitals that use Joint Commission accreditation for deemed status, says the EP now requires hospitals address in those policies visitation rights procedures, such as restrictions or limitations (including those clinically necessary).
EP 2 requires hospitals communicate the patient of those rights. Under these new revisions, the hospital is required to inform the patient of these visitation rights. This includes, perhaps most significantly, the right to receive the visitors designated by the patient. These visitors include including, but not limited to, spouses, a domestic partners–including same sex domestic partners–friends, or family members. The note also states that the patient has the right to withdraw or deny such consent at any time.
Further details are expected in the August 2011 edition of Joint Commission Perspectives. More details can be found on The Joint Commission’s website here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Cut through the confusion related to different kinds of wound debridements
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Coding concurrent therapy under the MDS 3.0
- Searched
