From the AHAP Blog: Joint Commission calls CMS revised telemedicine standards a "positive step"
AHAP Accreditation Connection, May 17, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to AHAP Accreditation Connection!
The Joint Commission has released an official statement reacting to revisions by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to its telemedicine credentialing and privileging requirements, set to go into effect July 5, 2011.
These revised requirements align with The Joint Commission’s long-standing stance that heavy credentialing and privileging requirements for telemedicine healthcare providers are an excessive burden to hospitals and actually impede access to specific healthcare services.
Click here to read more of this post on the AHAP blog.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to AHAP Accreditation Connection!
Related Products
-
Hospital Safety Center
Improve compliance with hospital safety standards from The Joint Commission, OSHA, and other regulators with this...
-
Healthcare Life Safety Compliance
Learn Life Safety Code tips and interpretations for healthcare facilities with this in-depth monthly resource.
-
The Joint Commission Mock Tracer Made Simple
This updated edition of our annual best-seller includes new tools and case studies of successful tracers from facilities...
-
Simplifying Nursing Documentation
Implement a "two-form" solution that will cut nursing documentation in half while fully complying with Joint Commission...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Cut through the confusion related to different kinds of wound debridements
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Coding concurrent therapy under the MDS 3.0
- Searched