Greeley Reflections
Accreditation Connection, February 25, 2011
Having Confidence in your contractors' performance
Part 6 of 7
Further eview your process
Continuing our list of questions to make sure you during the review of your contract process, here are some additional items to consider:
- Does the contract describe the expectations of performance as a basis to evaluate the services provided? It’s good practice to set your targets up front.
- Is the measurement process clear? Some organizations only meet with their contractors annually while others set up a series of meetings to provide feedback on a regular basis.
- Is there active oversight of the contractors’ performance in your organization? What is it? Who is involved? In the example of the delayed completion of the rehabilitation assessments, floor staff was well aware of the length of time it was taking but was never asked for feedback.
- Is there planned follow-up when expectations are not met to improve performance? What is the process and has it ever been implemented? When the data starts trending downward, what should happen? These are expectations that should be discussed at the initiation of the contract.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Cut through the confusion related to different kinds of wound debridements
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Coding concurrent therapy under the MDS 3.0
- Searched
