Joint Commission proposes performance expectations for ORYX measures
Accreditation Connection, January 28, 2011
The Joint Commission has opened for field review a proposed requirement intended to establish performance expectations for ORYX accountability measures in hospitals.
The Joint Commission requires hospitals to provide performance measurement data for their ORYX core measures quarterly, but does not have in place a mechanism for requiring organizations to then achieve a specific level of performance in conjunction with this data.
The new Element of Performance proposed in this field review would establish a target performance rate for ORYX accountability measures.
For specific details on this proposed Element of Performance or to participate in The Joint Commission’s field review, visit the organization’s website.
Related Products
-
Information Management and Record of Care, Treatment, and Services:
The new, fully updated Information Management and Record of Care, Seventh Edition, is a comprehensive guide to the most...
-
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Leadership
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Leadership breaks down the Joint Commission’s leadership requirements into easy-to-understand...
-
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Performance Improvement
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Performance Improvement breaks down The Joint Commission’s performance improvement...
-
The Chapter Leader's Guide to the Medical Staff
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Medical Staff breaks down the Joint Commission’s medical staff requirements into...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Cut through the confusion related to different kinds of wound debridements
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Coding concurrent therapy under the MDS 3.0
- Searched