From the AHAP Blog: Joint Commission reduces full survey timeframe from 39 to 36 months
AHAP Accreditation Connection, November 23, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to AHAP Accreditation Connection!
The Joint Commission will reduce the timeframe for surveys by three months. This new rule will go into effect January 1, 2011. Previously, hospitals could expect a survey within 18-39 months of The Joint Commission’s previous visit; that time frame will now be between 18-36 months.
The change comes as part of The Joint Commission’s offers to align with CMS requirements; CMS requires home healthcare agencies, advanced diagnostic imaging facilities, and providers of durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthodontics, and supplies to be surveyed within 36 months.
Visit the AHAP blog for more information.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to AHAP Accreditation Connection!
Related Products
-
Information Management and Record of Care, Treatment, and Services:
The new, fully updated Information Management and Record of Care, Seventh Edition, is a comprehensive guide to the most...
-
The Joint Commission Mock Tracer Made Simple
This updated edition of our annual best-seller includes new tools and case studies of successful tracers from facilities...
-
RFI Clarification
This 90-minute Webcast illustrates that not all requirements for improvement (RFIs) received during a Joint Commission...
-
The National Patient Safety Goals Calculator 2011
These Excel–based tools—delivered on CD-ROM with a step-by-step User’s Manual—provide the most organized way to collect...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Defining 'integral' for self-administered drugs is challenging
- Cut through the confusion related to different kinds of wound debridements
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched