Joint Commission proposes new and revised lab standards for 2011
Accreditation Connection, September 10, 2010
The Joint Commission has posted new and revised laboratory services standards for 2011 for field review on its main Web site.
The field review will remain open through October 19, 2010 and should the proposed changes receive approval would effective July 1, 2011.
The Joint Commission has made these changes to the standards based on feedback from the field. Some of the changes address flow cytometric analysis, amniotic fluid alpha protein and high performance liquid chromatography and other laboratory functions.
Note: this field review does not include blood transfusion service or blood donor center standards—these will be forthcoming later in September. For more information, click here.
Related Products
-
Information Management and Record of Care, Treatment, and Services:
The new, fully updated Information Management and Record of Care, Seventh Edition, is a comprehensive guide to the most...
-
The Joint Commission Mock Tracer Made Simple
This updated edition of our annual best-seller includes new tools and case studies of successful tracers from facilities...
-
Simplifying Nursing Documentation
Implement a "two-form" solution that will cut nursing documentation in half while fully complying with Joint Commission...
-
Chapter Leader's Guide to Provision of Care
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Provision of Care is designed to examine and explain the Provision of Care standards for the...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Do not separately report defibrillation
- Defining 'integral' for self-administered drugs is challenging
- Cut through the confusion related to different kinds of wound debridements
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Searched