Interim Staffing Effectiveness standards to receive feild review
Accreditation Connection, July 30, 2010
The Joint Commission has announced that it will undertake a follow-up field review for two proposed interim elements of performance relating to Staffing Effectiveness.
The proposed changes, found under Elements of Performance (EP) 12 and 13 in standard PI.02.01.01, focus on using outcomes data to guide analysis of staffing effectiveness and also call for leadership to review the data that comes out of staffing issue analysis.
The field review comes as a result of feedback from the field--while the majority of respondents think the requirements are reasonable, many indicated that the language regarding expectations for EP 12 left them somewhat confused, while EP 13 may require additional clarity on what should be included in the annual evaluation and what data must be included if no staffing issues were found.
For more information on these changes, visit the Joint Commission's web site.
Related Products
-
Information Management and Record of Care, Treatment, and Services:
The new, fully updated Information Management and Record of Care, Seventh Edition, is a comprehensive guide to the most...
-
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Leadership
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Leadership breaks down the Joint Commission’s leadership requirements into easy-to-understand...
-
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Performance Improvement
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Performance Improvement breaks down The Joint Commission’s performance improvement...
-
The Chapter Leader's Guide to the Medical Staff
The Chapter Leader's Guide to Medical Staff breaks down the Joint Commission’s medical staff requirements into...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Do not separately report defibrillation
- Defining 'integral' for self-administered drugs is challenging
- Cut through the confusion related to different kinds of wound debridements
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Searched