The Joint Commission reinstates anti-discrimination requirements to Leadership standards
Accreditation Connection, April 26, 2010
The Joint Commission has announced it will reinstate an anti-discrimination requirement which had previously been removed, according to an official statement by the accreditation organization.
As of July 1, 2010, this requirement—deleted originally in 2003 with the thought that it was covered under other, existing standards—will be reinstated due to research on which professionals those requirements cover. In fact, existing requirements usually only effect employees, and thus physicians, who are most often not employees of the hospital, were not covered under the requirements.
The changes will impact two Elements of Performance (EP) in the medical staff standards: EP MS.06.01.07 and EP MS.07.01.01 (discussing gender, race, creed, national origin).
The decision follows a request by the American Medical Association’s Women Physician’s Congress that the requirement be put back into place.
To read more on the updates, click here.
Related Products
-
Hospital Safety Center
Improve compliance with hospital safety standards from The Joint Commission, OSHA, and other regulators with this...
-
Healthcare Life Safety Compliance
Learn Life Safety Code tips and interpretations for healthcare facilities with this in-depth monthly resource.
-
Root Cause Analysis Basics
Our experts have put their years of RCA experience to work for you. This valuable guide will explain how to conduct an RCA...
-
The Compliance Guide to the Joint Commission Medical Staff Standards
Now in its sixth edition, this book features completely updated information, tools, and insights that will help guide you in...
-
Briefings on The Joint Commission
Briefings on The Joint Commission will help you with all of your accreditation and survey preparation needs. Every month...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q&A: Acute respiratory failure diagnosis does not require intubation
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Q/A: New code for image-guided minimally invasive lumbar decompression
- Do not separately report defibrillation
- Defining 'integral' for self-administered drugs is challenging
- Cut through the confusion related to different kinds of wound debridements
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Searched