Grievances, Complaints, and Patients’ Rights
Accreditation Monthly, March 9, 2010
Simply put, CMS defines a grievance as a written or verbal complaint by a patient or patient's representative regarding care or services, abuse or neglect, or potential violations of the Conditions of Participation (CoP). CMS is very specific in the Patient Rights chapter of the CoP (§482.13, A-0118–A-0123) regarding the expectation of prompt resolution to grievances in both the inpatient and outpatient areas.
The Joint Commission has aligned its requirements to CMS in this area by mandating that a complaint resolution process be in place in the Rights and Leaderships chapters.¹ Staff must be able to demonstrate understanding of your organization's policy related to complaint resolution. For example, it's great for staff to know that patients can call The Joint Commission with complaints, but it is not so good if they can't provide the number or know how to direct the complainant to the accrediting body.
In general, we find that outpatient staffs are vulnerable to being less familiar with the hospital's written grievance process. It's a good practice to review the information published in patient handbooks regularly and make it accessible for staff if necessary.
Aside from demonstrating that your policy and your practices are in compliance with the requirements, you must show that they have been approved by your governing body. Items to consider in the review of your process include whether:
- You are responding to complaints and grievance in writing within seven days. If not, has the patient or patient's representative been informed that you are still working on the issue and provided with a new timeframe for potential resolution?
- The response is composed in a manner that can be understood, including incorporating language or cultural sensitivities into the resolution process.
- Complaints and your response to the matter being tracked so you can demonstrate compliance with the regulations and your own policy.
- Grievance data are evaluated and considered in your organization performance improvement plans.
It is the expectation that quality and safety issues are being managed by leadership, which includes the involvement of your governing body.
¹The Joint Commission Hospital Accreditation Manual (RI.01.07.01, EPs 1–2, 4, 6–7, 10, 18–20; LD.01.03.01, EP 1–3; LD.04.01.07, EP 1–2).
Laure Dudley, Consultant, March 2010
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS puts hospital surveys on limited hold as surge continues
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- Skills of effective case managers
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- E-mailed
-
- CMS puts hospital surveys on limited hold as surge continues
- Charge and bill Medicare all pre-operative diagnostic tests
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- How to create a safety protocol for emergency department psychiatric patients
- Get the facts on emergency department FAST exams
- Understand how to report services during the global period for minor surgeries
- Study: Male residents are twice as likely to interrupt
- Q&A: Report separately payable drugs under revenue code 0636
- Q&A: Mechanical room storage, risk assessments, patient rooms
- Capturing start and stop times for infusions
- Searched