Joint Commission opens proposed version of MS.01.01.01 (formerly MS.1.20) for comment
Accreditation Connection, December 28, 2009
The Joint Commission has released a proposed version of medical staff standard MS.01.01.01 (formerly MS.1.20) and is seeking comment on the proposed version until January 28.
The Joint Commission convened a task force beginning in January 2008 after it received negative feedback from hospitals and physicians about the proposed standard. The task force consisted of professionals from the American College of Physicians, American College of Surgeons, American Dental Association, American Hospital Association, American Medical Association, Federation of American Hospitals, and National Association Medical Staff Services.
The updated MS.01.01.01 attempts to improve the current standard using the following principles (according to The Joint Commission):
- A well-functioning relationship between the governing body, hospital leadership, and the medical staff is essential to the delivery of high quality, safe care
- Effective communication is the lubricant that keeps relationships functioning well; it therefore is important that structures and processes support it
- Well-functioning relationships also depend on all parties knowing what is expected of them, and being able to live up to those expectations
To read more on the proposed changes click here.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: TPO disclosures to a business associate
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- The debate continues: Nurses who reported physician to the Texas Medical Board file federal appeal
- State medical board will hear unprofessional charges against OB-GYN
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Q/A: Coding infusions to correct low potassium levels
- Know criteria for coverage when podiatrists use Dermagraft® tissue substitute
- Note: Clarification of reference (non-patient) laboratory testing
- Facility E/M Levels, 2009 OPPS
- Do not separately report defibrillation
- Defining 'integral' for self-administered drugs is challenging
- Consider the big picture before querying physicians
- Conference Update: 2012 CDI Professional of the Year nominations, poster session submission period open; additional discount hotel rooms acquired
- Cohesive History and Physical Requirements
- Searched
