Greeley Reflections
Accreditation Connection, September 28, 2009
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Accreditation Connection!
Prudence or wisdom? Can your policies pass muster?
Part 2 of 4
Approximately 5% of the Joint Commission elements of performance (EP) are frequently cited. These are the Joint Commission EPs and CMS requirements that have the seemingly the greatest impact on an organization’s ability to consistently deliver quality and safe care. Consistency is the key and this can be driven by a successful policy and procedure review process.
When developing or revising a policy, “tag” that policy with the corresponding Joint Commission standard and EP as well as creating a link to the CMS Condition of Participation “A” Tag. Once you have this set up as a system, as requirements and regulations are updated or change, it is easy to find the policy or policies and make the necessary changes.
During the revision or review process, take the policy to the bedside. Talk with the staff about the requirements and the methods they are currently using. Identify short cuts that staff have developed. Sometimes these are reasonable and still maintain compliance. Other times, these short cuts can lead to missed steps, resulting in non-compliance. Take the time to talk with the staff to understand why the short cuts or "workarounds" were implemented and help to keep the process sensible to the end user. This will ensure compliance and consistency. Practice will match policy.
Policies that are created from textbooks or in isolation often can create unreasonable expectations of the end user. Implementation of the policy when put into practice and then placed under scrutiny can result in non-compliance because the steps did not make sense and therefore they were not followed. Keep the process simple. Review the minimum expectations and align the policy accordingly. Just because something sounds good on paper does not mean it can be easily and consistently accomplished.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to Accreditation Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- 2010 ICD-9 code updates now available online
- Master modifiers to ensure accurate reimbursement
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Don’t be scared into silence: Affiliation letter safeguards allow you to disclose more
- National Quality Forum creates standardized set of data for electronic health records
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Understand the H1N1 Flu and how to code it
- E-mailed
-
- Credentialing monthly: What is the role of the credentials committee in addressing unprofessional conduct?
- Q/A: Billing telemetry daily monitoring
- Radiologist indicted for fraudulently signing reports
- Revised MS.1.20 'huge improvement', out for comment again
- H1N1 hits Maine facility
- New report reveals $47 billion in Medicare fraud
- Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations, December 2009
- Hand hygiene rates improved through variety of reinforcement styles
- Press Ganey report: Patient satisfaction increasing across the country
- Residency Program Alert, December 2009
- Searched
